Mitigating surgical emergency practice during COVID-19 pandemic?
Noman Zafar 1, Florence Kashora 1, Kamran Qurashi 1, Jasim Al-Musawi 1, Josef Watfah 1, Lampros Liasis 1, Manoj Sen 1, Stuart Gould 1, Carolynne ] Vaizey 2,3, Janindra Warusavitarne 2,3, Cosimo Alex Leo 1,2
Affiliations
Article Info
1 Department of Surgery, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare Trus, Harrow, United Kingdom
2 Imperial College London,Kensington, London, United Kingdom
3 Department of Surgery, $t Mark's Hospiral Academic lnstitute, London Norh West Universiny Healthcare Trust, Harow, United Kingdom
Abstract
PURPOSE: To define the change in Emergency Surgical Unit (ESU) workload during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Patient data for a three-week period was prospectively collected for ESU patients during lockdown period and compared to the ESU workload for the same time period prior to lockdown. RESULTS: Surgical emergencies admissions reduced by 2.5 times during our study period (p value = 0.001). In this changed paradigm, the overall number of surgical emergencies were reduced. A high mortality (n = 4, 5.7%) was noted during lockdown period as compared to pre-lockdown period (n = 1, 0.58%, p value = 0.025). Almost half of surgical admissions were tested for COVID-19 based on their symptoms and more than third (n=14, 38.9%) of them were positive. Gastrointestinal symptoms were common in COVID-19 positive group (85.7%) and only a third (36%) of COVID-19 positive patients needed surgical attention. Chest x-ray findings were comparable to PCR testing in terms of sensitivity and specificity but CT chest was more sensitive. CONCLUSIONS: It remains unclear how COVID-19 reduced surgical emergencies. A significant proportion of COVID-19 presented with gastrointestinal symptoms. In a new outbreak all General Surgical patients should be tested with CRP and WCC used as a triage adjunct.
Keywords
- Coronavirus
- COVID-19
- Emergency Surgery Pandemic
- General Surgery
