1 Mar 2021Article
A comparison of crystal phenol treatment, midline primary closure and Limberg flap reconstruction methods in female patients with primary pilonidal sinus disease
Murat Kanlioz 1Hacer Uyanikoglu 2Uğur Ekici 3Turgay Karatas 4Faik Tatli 5
Affiliations
Article Info
1 Çankaya University, Medical Faculty Department of General Surgery, Ankara, Turkey
2 Harran University, Medical Faculty Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Şanliurfa, Turkey
3 İstanbul Gelişim University, Saglik Sciences Faculty Department of General Surgery, Istanbul, Turkey
4 Inonu University, Medical Faculty Department of General Surgery, Malatya, Turkey
5 Harran University, Medical Faculty Department of General Surgery, Şanliurfa, Turkey
Ann. Ital. Chir., 2021, 92(2), 196-200;
Published: 1 Mar 2021
Copyright © 2021 Annali Italiani di Chirurgia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is a chronic problem often occurs in healthy hirsute men, however, women may also be affected. A range of conservative techniques to surgical flaps have been used to treat this condition. Currently, midline primary closure (MPC) is considered the standard of therapy; however, no statistically significant difference has been noted between primary versus secondary (Karydakis flap or Limberg flap) closure. Recently, flap reconstruction methods have been applied and superiority of these methods have been shown. Treatment methods should be employed to the individual, taking into account recurrence and complication rates of the method, recovery time, patients' preference and surgeon's skill.
Keywords
- Crystal Phenol Treatment
- Female Patient
- Pilonidal Sinus
- Limberg Flap Reconstruction
- Primary Midline Closure