1 Mar 2018Editorial
Evolution in the surgical management of hemorrhoidal disease
Angelo Guttadauro 1Matteo Maternini 1Marco Chiarelli 2Giulia Bianco 1Nicoletta Pecora 1Francesco Gabrielli 1
Affiliations
Article Info
1 University of Milano-Bicocca, General Surgery Department, Istituti Clinici Zucchi, Monza, Italy
2 General Surgery Department, Ospedale di Lecco, Italy
Ann. Ital. Chir., 2018, 89(2), 101-106;
Published: 1 Mar 2018
Copyright © 2018 Annali Italiani di Chirurgia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Hemorrhoidal disease is a very common condition requiring surgical management in approximately 10% of cases. Despite its long history and high prevalence, we are still trying to identify the best treatment. Earlier surgical approaches were soon abandoned and now only detain an historic significance. For long, proctologists have given their preference to hemorrhoidectomy that was gradually perfected through the years. The true innovation came in 1937, with the famous Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy, still one of the leading interventions for treatment of hemorrhoids. Less fortune encountered alternative techniques, such as the Whitehead hemorrhoidectomy, and closed and semi-closed techniques. Later on, the advent of a new concept of the pathogenesis of hemorrhoidal disease has brought to the development of stapled prolassectomy techniques. This approach has encountered both supporters and detractors between the experts in this field and has received a strong impulse by the emerging trend towards “day-surgery”. Today the search for the best surgical technique for hemorrhoidal disease is far from being over and witnesses the introduction of new techniques for hemorrhoidal dissection. The choice of the best strategy remains in the hands of the clinician in the modern conception of tailored surgery.
Keywords
- Hemorrhoidal disease
- Hemorrhoidectomy
- Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy