1 Jul 2014Article
Treatment of median incisional hernia Laparoscopic vs. open surgery: meta-analysis
Francesco Coratti 1Andrea Coratti 2Riccardo Malatesti 1Fabrizio Varrone 2Walter Testi 1Vinno Savelli 1Vanessa Borgogni 1
Affiliations
Article Info
1 Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Dipartimento di Chirurgia, Università degli Studi di Siena, Italy
2 Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Dipartimento di Chirurgia, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy
Ann. Ital. Chir., 2014, 85(4), 358-364;
Published: 1 Jul 2014
Copyright © 2014 Annali Italiani di Chirurgia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
In the last ten years we assisted to spreading of laparoscopic approach on the correction of median incisional hernia, although for increased interesting toward mini-invasive techniques than for matching results between lap and open approaches. The aim of our study is the critical analysis of the results of lap and open surgery in the approach of ventral hernia, through the meta-analytical revision of the principal checked prospective trials. There were emerged 7 perspective studies to fit to a meta-analysis with the revision of the literature, with 1165 patients in total. Among the perioperative outcomes the briefer surgical time and a reduction of postoperative hospitalization were observed with the significant statistic data in favor of the lap. Laparoscopy can be considered a valid technical alternative to traditional open surgery in the treatment of ventral incisional hernia. The advantages of mini-invasive approach are the reducing of the surgical time and of the total hospital stay. There were not emerged any significant differences regarding the other surgical end-points or the recurrences of hernias after 1 and 5 years.
Keywords
- Laparoscopy
- Median incisional hernia
- Open surgery