1 Mar 2002Article
STAPLING ANOPEXY VS. TRADITIONAL HAEMORRHOIDECTOMY: COMPARATIVE OUTCOME OF TWO GROUPS OF PATIENTS
M. Gentile 1A.M. Cricrì 1D. D’Antonio 1L. Bucci 1
Affiliations
Article Info
1 Dipartimento di Chirurgia Generale, Geriatrica, Oncologica e Tecnologie Avanzate, Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”
Ann. Ital. Chir., 2002, 73(2), 181-186;
Published: 1 Mar 2002
Copyright © 2002
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Authors compare the results of two groups of patients, with III and IV degree haemorrhoids. The first group (48 patients) were treated with traditional surgery, open or closed. The second group (42 patients) treated with stapling haemorrhoidectomy. The groups were compared in order to determine if a true advantage exists regarding post-operative pain and functional recovery. Authors conclude that stapler haemorrhoidectomy, is somehow better in reducing the pain and offers a quick functional recovery. But the technique must be adopted in selected patients with mucosal prolapse, when the haemorrhoidal plexus is below the dentate line. In those cases, with inveterate mucosal prolapse, and thickened external fibrous tissue, or an irreducible prolapse of the external haemorrhoidal plexus, the choice must be carefully evalutated.
Keywords
- Anopexy
- haemorrhoidectomy
- Stapler
- ruber band ligation
- Postoperative pain