Lichtenstein vs Rutkow-Robbins technique in the treatment of primary inguinal hernia. Analysis of the long term results

Main Article Content

Stefano Bolognini
Vincenzo Orsini
Pier Paolo Grandinetti
Francesco Pata
Rosario Sacco

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The AA. compared the preliminary results of two different methods of inguinal hernioplasty: one using only the mesh (Lichtenstein) and the other one using both mesh and plug (Rutkow-Robbins).


PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy consecutive patients were randomly allocated into two groups, 35 patients each one, to receive either a Licthenstein mesh or a Rutkow-Robbins plug and mesh for primary monolateral groin hernia.


RESULTS: Follow-up was planned at 1 week, 3 weeks, 3 and 6 months after surgery. The Authors evaluated early and late complications i.e.: the presence of parasthesia, postoperative pain and the incidence of recurrence. The results were analized statistically using the Fisher and χ2 tests.


CONCLUSIONS: Data parameters did not show statistically significative differences between the two groups (p>0.05). No recurrences were detected. The Authors concluded that no advantage may derivate by an additional plug to the single mesh hernia repair.

Article Details

How to Cite
Bolognini, Stefano, et al. “Lichtenstein Vs Rutkow-Robbins Technique in the Treatment of Primary Inguinal Hernia. Analysis of the Long Term Results”. Annali Italiani Di Chirurgia, vol. 77, no. 1, Jan. 2006, pp. 51-56, https://annaliitalianidichirurgia.it/index.php/aic/article/view/2382.
Section
Article