Postoperative hematomas after thyroid surgery. Incidence and risk factors in our experience

Main Article Content

Pietro Giorgio Calò
Giuseppe Pisano
Gabriele Piga
Fabio Medas
Alberto Tatti
Marcello Donati
Angelo Nicolosi

Abstract

AIM: The aim of our study was to evaluate the incidence and timing of postoperative bleeding and to identify the potential aetiological factors of cervical hematomas complicating thyroid surgery.


MATERIAL: Between September 2002 and December 2009, 2559 patients were operated on in Department of Surgery,
University Hospital of Cagliari. 2257 total thyroidectomies, 191 total thyroidectomies associated to lymphadenectomy, 83 total thyroidectomies associated to parathyroidectomy, 24 thyroid lobectomies and 4 lobectomies associated to parathyroidectomy were performed.


RESULTS: 35 Patients (1.36%) developed a postoperative hematoma, 32 of whom (1.25%) needed a surgical revision.
Male sex seemed to have a greater risk: 13 men (2.79% of all males) vs. 19 women (0.90% of all female cases) had
to undergo haemostasis revision (p=0.00204). 16 of 32 patients (50%) who underwent surgical revision had hypertension; incidence of hematoma was 2.09% in patients with hypertension and 0.89% in patients without it (p=0.02112)


DISCUSSION: It is generally difficult to predict which patients are at risk for the development of a hematoma after thyroid surgery. The most intense postoperative monitoring is necessary during the first six hours but hematomas occurring after are not rare.


CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative hematoma remains a rare but potentially life-threatening complication. Early recognition with immediate intervention is the key to the management of this complication. Because of the possibly long interval between the initial operation and the hematoma development, ambulatory and one-day thyroid surgery is not advisable

Article Details

How to Cite
Calò, Pietro Giorgio, et al. “Postoperative Hematomas After Thyroid Surgery. Incidence and Risk Factors in Our Experience”. Annali Italiani Di Chirurgia, vol. 81, no. 5, Sept. 2010, pp. 343-7, https://annaliitalianidichirurgia.it/index.php/aic/article/view/2221.
Section
Article